Implications of Rupture Process and Site Effects in the Spatial Distribution and Amplitude of the Near-Fault Ground Motion From the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake
                        
                    
                    
                    
                    
                 
                
                
                    
                    
                    Page Content
 
       
        
         |   | 
  
       
    
    
    
  
  
  |  | 
         
         | 
        
         | by Arben Pitarka, Nancy Collins, Hong-Kie Thio, Robert Graves and Paul Somerville Pitarka, Arben, Nancy Collins, Hong-Kie Thio, Robert Graves and Paul Somerville (2006). Implications of Rupture Process and Site Effects in the Spatial Distribution and Amplitude of the Near-Fault Ground Motion From the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake. SMIP06
   Seminar on Utilization of Strong-Motion Data, p. 19 - 40.
 Click on the link below for the full text: 
 Abstract
 
       The 2004 Mw6 Parkfield earthquake is the last in a series of several strike-slip earthquakes that have 
    occurred on the same fault located in a zone that marks the transition between a creeping section and a 
    locked section of the San Andreas Fault in central California. Ground motion data recorded at a dense 
    network of near-fault stations installed by California Geological Survey (CGS) and United States Geological 
    Survey (USGS) are unprecedented in terms of quality and characteristics for this type of earthquake in 
    California. Although of moderate size, the earthquake produced near-fault ground motion acceleration 
    that exceeds predictions from empirical ground motion models.  At three sites the recorded acceleration 
    was more than 1.0 g (Shakal et al., 2005).  Very large peak ground velocities of up to 83 cm/s were also 
    recorded at both ends of the fault.  On the other hand, most of the stations located very near to the 
    fault recorded ground motion with very low acceleration and velocity.  In this study we investigate the 
    implication of the rupture kinematics and dynamics, and local site effects in the amplitude and spatial 
    variation of the near-fault ground motion for this earthquake. 
   
 
 |  |   
         |  |  |